NCBI
PubMed
A service of the
U.S. National Library of Medicine
and the
National Institutes of Health
My NCBI
[Sign In]
[Register]
All Databases
PubMed
Nucleotide
Protein
Genome
Structure
OMIM
PMC
Journals
Books
Search
Database name
PubMed
Protein
Nucleotide
GSS
EST
Structure
Genome
Books
CancerChromosomes
Conserved Domains
dbGaP
3D Domains
Gene
Genome Project
GENSAT
GEO Profiles
GEO DataSets
HomoloGene
Journals
MeSH
NCBI Web Site
NLM Catalog
OMIA
OMIM
PMC
PopSet
Probe
Protein Clusters
PubChem BioAssay
PubChem Compound
PubChem Substance
SNP
Taxonomy
ToolKit
ToolKitAll
UniGene
UniSTS
for
Search term
Go
Clear
Advanced Search
Limits
Preview/Index
History
Clipboard
Details
Your browser version may not work well with NCBI's Web applications. More information
here...
Display
Summary
Brief
Abstract
AbstractPlus
Citation
MEDLINE
XML
UI List
LinkOut
ASN.1
Related Articles
Cited in Books
CancerChrom Links
Domain Links
3D Domain Links
dbGaP Links
GEO DataSet Links
Gene Links
Gene (OMIM) Links
Gene (GeneRIF) Links
Genome Links
Project Links
GENSAT Links
GEO Profile Links
HomoloGene Links
Nucleotide Links
Nucleotide (RefSeq) Links
Nucleotide (Weighted) Links
EST Links
EST (RefSeq) Links
GSS Links
GSS (RefSeq) Links
OMIA Links
OMIM (calculated) Links
OMIM (cited) Links
BioAssay Links
Compound Links
Compound (MeSH Keyword)
Compound (Publisher) Links
Substance Links
Substance (MeSH Keyword)
Substance (Publisher) Links
PMC Links
Cited in PMC
PopSet Links
Probe Links
Protein Links
Protein (RefSeq) Links
Protein (Weighted) Links
Protein Cluster Links
Cited Articles
SNP Links
SNP (Cited)
Structure Links
Taxonomy via GenBank
UniGene Links
UniSTS Links
Show
5
10
20
50
100
200
500
Sort By
Pub Date
First Author
Last Author
Journal
Title
Send to
Text
File
Printer
Clipboard
Collections
E-mail
Order
All: 1
Review: 0
Click to change filter selection through MyNCBI.
1:
Arch Intern Med.
2008 Mar 24;168(6):632-42.
Related Articles
,
Links
Treatment success in cancer: new cancer treatment successes identified in phase 3 randomized controlled trials conducted by the National Cancer Institute-sponsored cooperative oncology groups, 1955 to 2006.
Djulbegovic B
,
Kumar A
,
Soares HP
,
Hozo I
,
Bepler G
,
Clarke M
,
Bennett CL
.
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Dr, MRC, Room 2067H, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. benjamin.djulbegovic@moffitt.org
BACKGROUND: The evaluation of research output, such as estimation of the proportion of treatment successes, is of ethical, scientific, and public importance but has rarely been evaluated systematically. We assessed how often experimental cancer treatments that undergo testing in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) result in discovery of successful new interventions. METHODS: We extracted data from all completed (published and unpublished) phase 3 RCTs conducted by the National Cancer Institute cooperative groups since their inception in 1955. Therapeutic successes were determined by (1) assessing the proportion of statistically significant trials favoring new or standard treatments, (2) determining the proportion of the trials in which new treatments were considered superior to standard treatments according to the original researchers, and (3) quantitatively synthesizing data for main clinical outcomes (overall and event-free survival). RESULTS: Data from 624 trials (781 randomized comparisons) involving 216 451 patients were analyzed. In all, 30% of trials had statistically significant results, of which new interventions were superior to established treatments in 80% of trials. The original researchers judged that the risk-benefit profile favored new treatments in 41% of comparisons (316 of 766). Hazard ratios for overall and event-free survival, available for 614 comparisons, were 0.95 (99% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.98) and 0.90 (99% CI, 0.87- 0.93), respectively, slightly favoring new treatments. Breakthrough interventions were discovered in 15% of trials. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 25% to 50% of new cancer treatments that reach the stage of assessment in RCTs will prove successful. The pattern of successes has become more stable over time. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that the ethical principle of equipoise defines limits of discoverability in clinical research and ultimately drives therapeutic advances in clinical medicine.
Publication Types:
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
PMID: 18362256 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Display
Summary
Brief
Abstract
AbstractPlus
Citation
MEDLINE
XML
UI List
LinkOut
ASN.1
Related Articles
Cited in Books
CancerChrom Links
Domain Links
3D Domain Links
dbGaP Links
GEO DataSet Links
Gene Links
Gene (OMIM) Links
Gene (GeneRIF) Links
Genome Links
Project Links
GENSAT Links
GEO Profile Links
HomoloGene Links
Nucleotide Links
Nucleotide (RefSeq) Links
Nucleotide (Weighted) Links
EST Links
EST (RefSeq) Links
GSS Links
GSS (RefSeq) Links
OMIA Links
OMIM (calculated) Links
OMIM (cited) Links
BioAssay Links
Compound Links
Compound (MeSH Keyword)
Compound (Publisher) Links
Substance Links
Substance (MeSH Keyword)
Substance (Publisher) Links
PMC Links
Cited in PMC
PopSet Links
Probe Links
Protein Links
Protein (RefSeq) Links
Protein (Weighted) Links
Protein Cluster Links
Cited Articles
SNP Links
SNP (Cited)
Structure Links
Taxonomy via GenBank
UniGene Links
UniSTS Links
Show
5
10
20
50
100
200
500
Sort By
Pub Date
First Author
Last Author
Journal
Title
Send to
Text
File
Printer
Clipboard
Collections
E-mail
Order
About Entrez
Text Version
Entrez PubMed
Overview
Help
|
FAQ
Tutorials
New/Noteworthy
E-Utilities
PubMed Services
Journals Database
MeSH Database
Single Citation Matcher
Batch Citation Matcher
Clinical Queries
Special Queries
LinkOut
My NCBI
Related Resources
Order Documents
NLM Mobile
NLM Catalog
NLM Gateway
TOXNET
Consumer Health
Clinical Alerts
ClinicalTrials.gov
PubMed Central
Write to the Help Desk
NCBI
|
NLM
|
NIH
Department of Health & Human Services
Privacy Statement
|
Freedom of Information Act
|
Disclaimer